A federal judge in Texas issued a temporary order blocking a new immigration program from the Biden administration that may shield hundreds of thousands of undocumented spouses of U.S. citizens from deportation. The 14-day stay was issued in response to a lawsuit by 16 Republican-led states challenging the program.
The “Keeping Families Together” program, which was set in motion last week, would extend to those who have been here at least 10 years and would allow them to work legally in the United States. Immigration is now an important issue for a large number of voters with the presidential election just round the corner.
When the White House announced the plan in June, officials claimed over 500,000 spouses would be covered. In addition, the policy will cover 50,000 others under the age of 21, in whom their parent is a citizen of the United States.
federal judge in Texas citizen
This was the most significant relief program for undocumented migrants in the U.S. since the Obama administration’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals in 2012. The now-temporarily suspended program would have allowed undocumented spouses of U.S. citizens to qualify if they had lived in the country for at least a decade and were married as of June 17.
The judge ruled that the administration’s plan exceeded its authority and did not follow proper legal procedures. This ruling temporarily halts the policy, pausing the new procedures that would have allowed certain visa holders’ spouses to enter the U.S. more easily.
The Biden administration approved this policy as a palliative measure to the suffering families faced by separation resulting from delays in immigration procedures. According to officials, this change of policy will benefit the welfare of quite a number of families migrant and ease administrative work at the same time. But critics have raised an opinion about loopholes about such a change and even complicating its administration process.
Texas Judge Blocks Biden’s Plan for Migrant Spouses
The ruling has triggered mixed reactions. Proponents of the policy argue that it is critical to maintaining family unity and supporting the well-being of immigrants. Critics, however believe that the administration should respect judicial decisions and ensure new policies harmonize with established legal frameworks. Some argue that this ruling represents a need for more all-encompassing immigration reform.
The Biden administration has reacted with disappointment to the decision but said that it will review the ruling and explore all options available. The Department of Homeland Security and other agencies are likely to provide more guidance on the impact of the ruling and any interim measures that might be necessary.
The future of the administration’s policy and its impact on migrant families remain uncertain in this changing legal landscape. The ruling therefore highlights a complex relationship between immigration policy, legal interpretations, and efforts toward family unity in the U.S. immigration system.
Stay connected with Fact and US for more such news.