Murder charges filed against the father of a US school shooter are setting a new precedent with regard to parental responsibility.
Colin Gray purchased the AR-style rifle for his son Colt as an early Christmas gift last year, but that doesn’t change what had happened seven months earlier: the boy had been questioned by police over online threats to carry out a school shooting. Investigators believe the 14-year-old may have used that same weapon on Wednesday when he shot and killed four people and wounded nine others at Apalachee High School in Winder, Georgia.
Gray now faces multiple charges, which together carry a maximum sentence of 180 years in prison. In a rare legal move, the teen has been charged with murder, and so has his father. Colin Gray, 54, faces two counts of second-degree murder, four counts of involuntary manslaughter, and eight counts of cruelty to children.
Contents
Georgia Shooting Case
The recent shooting incident in Georgia points a finger at parental responsibility over gun safety. This case involves a child gaining access to an unlocked gun and firing it accidentally, leaving that child badly injured. This tragic incident saw the parent face criminal charges, thereby testing the legal and moral obligations linked to gun ownership.
District Attorney Lisa Carter, who is prosecuting the case, said firearm safety will ultimately be their message. “This case is important in defining the limits of parental responsibility in securing firearms,” Carter said. “It puts a spotlight on the need to secure guns in preventing such accidents.”
This case has opened a much broader debate on gun safety and the accountability of parents. Gun control proponents generally argue for clearer regulations on how firearms should be stored, saying that this case really needs better enforcement to prevent such tragic happenings to children.
Against this, critics say that whereas gun safety is paramount, preventative education also needs to feature much more than harsh legal action against such transgressions. The outcome of this case may shape future laws and policies regarding firearm responsibility.
As the trial continues, legal experts and the community will watch with bated breath to determine how this will impact future discourses surrounding gun safety and parental responsibility.
Can They Make the Charges Stick?
The murder charges against Colin Gray are based on his “knowingly allowing his son to possess a weapon,” said Chris Hosey, director of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation. The charges relate to the deaths of two teenagers: Christian Angulo and Mason Schermerhorn, both 14, who were killed in Wednesday’s shooting. Two teachers, Richard Aspinwall, 39, and Cristina Irimie, 53, also died in the attack.
The charges Gray faces are for second-degree murder, which may be tied to specific language in Georgia law. Under Georgia’s criminal code, second-degree murder occurs when, “in the commission of cruelty to children in the second degree, a person causes the death of another human being, irrespective of malice.”
Since the complaint was filed inside 24 hours of the shooting, experts warn that the facts are still emerging, and it is not known what legal arguments will be presented against Gray.
If He Didn’t Pull the Trigger, Why A Murder Case?
Across the U.S., there are laws that punish parents or guardians for issues like truancy, underage driving, shoplifting, and vandalism. Earlier this year, Michigan prosecutors went a step further in targeting these laws by convicting the parents of another teen gunman. James and Jennifer Crumbley were convicted of involuntary manslaughter in connection with negligence that led to their son Ethan, 14, killing four of his classmates in 2018. They were sentenced to at least 10 years in prison.
Now, charging Colin Gray with murder—a much more severe charge—could again test the limits of parental responsibility.
Where Could Punishing Parents Lead?
The wider implications of increasing prosecutors’ weaponry after a shooting concern some legal scholars. “We have a problem with violence and guns in our society,” said Ekow Yankah, a law and philosophy professor at the University of Michigan. “Instead of addressing it through systemic and regulatory changes, we comfort ourselves with these extraordinary prosecutions.”
Professor Yankah cautions that this legal “hammer” could be used disproportionately against poor families, minority groups, and single parents. “School shootings get a lot of attention, but I’m worried about the cases that won’t make the news,” he said.
While there has been growing pressure for parents to be held accountable for their children’s violent actions, there’s been much less movement toward limiting access to firearms or improving mental health resources for struggling kids. “Our default response to deep societal problems in the United States is to use.
Stay connected with fact and us for more such news.